Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Alt, Susan M en
dc.contributor.author Buchanan, Meghan Elizabeth en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-17T07:23:10Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-17T07:23:10Z
dc.date.issued 2015-04 en
dc.date.submitted 2015 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2022/19786
dc.description Thesis (Ph.D.) - Indiana University, Anthropology, 2015 en
dc.description.abstract As a period of relative peace associated with the founding of the Cahokia polity dissolved around AD 1150-1200, Mississippians living at Cahokia constructed fortifications, large portions of the population left the city, and walled compounds at the nearby East St. Louis site were destroyed in a large-scale conflagration event. Analyses and interpretations of the evidence for violence and warfare in the Mississippian Midwest have traditionally focused on the most overt manifestations of those phenomena: fortified community spaces, physical traumata, and symbols of violence like warriors, weapons of war, and severed body parts. However, historic and ethnographic accounts of peoples' lives and experiences during periods of war highlight that violence during politically and socially tumultuous times impacted the daily practices of wide swaths of people living in these societies. Carolyn Nordstrom (1997) advocates the telling of "a different kind of war story," one that focuses on human experiences, tragedies, and creativity in light of threats of danger. The Common Field site was founded by people leaving the Cahokia region during this period of political fragmentation and escalating violence. Shortly after settling at the site, the inhabitants constructed a fortification. A later catastrophic conflagration resulted in the burning of hundreds of structures, the destruction of a community, and the complete abandonment of the site. In this dissertation, I propose a theoretical and methodological framework for studying the intersections of violence and daily practices in archaeological contexts through an exploration of micro-scale actions (such as those enacted in histories of practices and embodied knowledge of technological processes) and macro-scale regional histories and practices in order to elucidate the multiple contexts and effects of violence and warfare in the past and their impacts on peoples' lived experiences. The data from Common Field demonstrate that the inhabitants of this site were engaged in processes of hybridity (with regards to ceramic technological practices and decorative techniques), moved resource procurement practices away from riverine contexts, and oriented themselves in new ways towards other regional communities and the supernatural realm. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University en
dc.subject archaeology en
dc.subject ceramics en
dc.subject magnetometry en
dc.subject Mississippian en
dc.subject warfare en
dc.subject zooarchaeology en
dc.subject.classification Archaeology en
dc.title Warfare and the Materialization of Daily Life at the Mississippian Common Field Site en
dc.type Doctoral Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IUScholarWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics